Post by Admin on Jul 8, 2015 19:44:21 GMT -4
But who is he I know he's a Democratic he's from Brooklyn NY and he's 74 come his next September birthday. But what is his issues and he's running with Hillary Clinton and she's on top in that race or at least you would like to think so this guy is gaining on her in some States will this be a close race who knows but I'm not sure he's the man and I think he could be just a tab bit to old. Hillary would be 69 by the time she would take office the same age as Reagan but this guy makes we feel could he hold office at his tender age of 75 if he won. Yikes !
I'm just saying the age thing is a factor with me anyway.
Just take a look at this :
The age comparisons between Hillary Clinton and Ronald Reagan seem as natural as they are nonsensical.
Yes, were Clinton to win in 2016, she would take office at age 69—just as Reagan did in 1981. And yes, the comparison is often made when Clinton's critics and allies debate whether she has the health to serve out two presidential terms.
But it's a wildly misleading comparison, as the number that matters when assessing Clinton's health is not her age, but her life expectancy. And there is where the Clinton-Reagan comparison is revealed as a stretch.
A combination of federal data and a more nuanced approach to calculating Clinton's life expectancy—one that includes her gender, era, and other factors—projects the would-be president living to age 86. That means Clinton would live a full 17 years after taking office, more than enough time to serve out two terms.
I'm just saying the age thing is a factor with me anyway.
Just take a look at this :
The age comparisons between Hillary Clinton and Ronald Reagan seem as natural as they are nonsensical.
Yes, were Clinton to win in 2016, she would take office at age 69—just as Reagan did in 1981. And yes, the comparison is often made when Clinton's critics and allies debate whether she has the health to serve out two presidential terms.
But it's a wildly misleading comparison, as the number that matters when assessing Clinton's health is not her age, but her life expectancy. And there is where the Clinton-Reagan comparison is revealed as a stretch.
A combination of federal data and a more nuanced approach to calculating Clinton's life expectancy—one that includes her gender, era, and other factors—projects the would-be president living to age 86. That means Clinton would live a full 17 years after taking office, more than enough time to serve out two terms.
